Gender Disparity In Public Sector Employment: A Study Of Federal Polytechnic Mubi

Authors

  • Adariju Hannatu Barka Adamawa State University, Mubi, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Administration and Management Sciences Author

Keywords:

Gender disparity, Public sector employment, Federal Polytechnic Mubi, Glass ceiling, Sticky floor, Gender equality, Recruitment practices

Abstract

This study examined gender disparity in public sector employment using the Federal Polytechnic Mubi as a case study, with specific focus on recruitment, promotion, leadership representation, and access to professional development opportunities. Employing a descriptive survey design within a quantitative framework, the study utilized a census approach covering all 2,367 academic and non-academic staff of the institution. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, validated through expert review and a Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.82, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent t-tests via SPSS version 25. The findings revealed substantial gender imbalance, with males constituting 69% of total staff and 74% of academic positions. A vast majority of respondents (89.6%) perceived recruitment practices as gender-biased, while 76.6% agreed that promotion processes favor men. Furthermore, 75.3% believed that male staff receive more access to training opportunities, and 75.4% disagreed that women are adequately represented in top management roles. T-test analyses confirmed significant gender-based differences in perceptions of recruitment (t = 2.770, p = 0.00566), promotion (t = -9.734, p < 0.001), and training (t = 14.669, p < 0.001), as well as in representation between academic and management roles (t = -3.826, p = 0.00013). The study concludes that systemic institutional barriers manifesting as both “glass ceiling” and “sticky floor” effects continue to limit women’s career advancement. It recommends the implementation of gender-responsive recruitment policies, mentorship programs, equitable access to training, and affirmative action in leadership appointments to foster inclusion and promote gender parity in the institution’s workforce. 

Downloads

Published

2025-11-15