Conflicting Judicial Decision And Operation Of Administrative Agencies In Nigeria: A Case Study Of Independent National Electoral Commission ( INEC)

Authors

  • Omale Danjuma Department of Public Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba Author
  • Aliyu Abdullahi Department of Public Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba Author
  • Ochijenu Samuel Adegbe Department of Public Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba Author

Keywords:

Judicial conflicts, administrative agencies, INEC, Electoral credibility, Democratic governance, Nigeria

Abstract

Conflicting judicial decisions remain a major challenge to the effective functioning of administrative agencies in Nigeria. This study examined how such inconsistencies affect the operations of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The objectives were to assess the effects of conflicting judicial decisions on INEC’s operations, evaluate their implications on electoral credibility, and analyze how judicial conflicts influence public trust in democratic governance. Anchored on the Administrative Law Theory, the study adopted a quantitative research design. Data were collected from INEC staff across three purposively selected State Offices Kogi (North-Central), Lagos (South-West), and Enugu (South-East) to reflect Nigeria’s geographical and political diversity. Findings revealed that conflicting judicial decisions have negatively impacted INEC’s operations by creating administrative uncertainty, delaying electoral processes, and undermining its autonomy. Respondents indicated that these judicial inconsistencies weakened electoral credibility through contradictory rulings on party primaries, candidate eligibility, and election outcomes, often leading to voter apathy. Furthermore, judicial conflicts were found to erode public trust in democratic governance, as citizens perceived the judiciary as inconsistent and susceptible to political influence. The study recommends that judicial authorities adopt clearer interpretative standards and ensure consistency in rulings relating to electoral matters. Strengthening institutional collaboration between the judiciary and INEC, promoting judicial training on electoral law, and establishing an appellate fast-track mechanism for pre-election cases were also suggested. These measures would reduce contradictions, enhance INEC’s operational effectiveness, restore electoral credibility, and rebuild public trust in Nigeria’s democratic system. 

Downloads

Published

2025-11-15